Diagnosis
Primary
orofacial herpes is readily identified by clinical examination of persons
with no previous history of lesions and contact with an individual with
known HSV-1 infection. The appearance and distribution of sores in these
individuals typically presents as multiple, round, superficial oral
ulcers, accompanied by acute gingivitis. Adults with non-typical presentation
are more difficult to diagnose. Prodromal symptoms that occur before
the appearance of herpetic lesions help differentiate HSV symptoms from
the similar symptoms of other disorders, such as allergic stomatitis.
When lesions do not appear inside the mouth primary orofacial herpes
is sometimes mistaken for impetigo, a bacterial infection. Common mouth
ulcers (aphthous ulcer) also resemble intraoral herpes, but do not present
a vesicular stage.
Genital
herpes can be more difficult to diagnose than oral herpes since most
HSV-2-infected persons have no classical symptoms. Further confusing
diagnosis, several other conditions resemble genital herpes, including
lichen planus, atopic dermatitis, and urethritis. Laboratory testing
is often used to confirm a diagnosis of genital herpes. Laboratory tests
include: culture of the virus, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) studies
to detect virus, skin biopsy, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to
test for presence of viral DNA. Although these procedures produce highly
sensitive and specific diagnoses, their high costs and time constraints
discourage their regular use in clinical practice.
Serological
tests for antibodies to HSV are rarely useful to diagnosis and not routinely
used in clinical practice, but are important in epidemiological studies.
Serologic assays cannot differentiate between antibodies generated in
response to a genital versus an oral HSV infection, and as such cannot
confirm the site of infection. Absence of antibody to HSV-2 does not
exclude genital infection because of the increasing incidence of genital
infections caused by HSV-1.